On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > My general inclination is to ask this to wait for gcc-8 as it is not a > regression, but instead a false positive in a new warning.
I'd hope it would be possible for current releases of GCC and glibc to build with each other. As this seems to be a case where the warning is clearly bogus (and started appearing during GCC stage 4), a fix in GCC seems more appropriate than disabling the warning for that code in glibc. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
