GCC Maintainers:
After further discussion of the two P8V_BUILTIN_VGBBD built-ins that do
not take any arguments, it was determined they should just be removed as
they are not valid.
The patch has been tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 8 LE)
with no regressions.
Is the patch OK for trunk?
Carl Love
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-01-24 Carl Love <[email protected]>
* config/rs6000/rs6000-c (altivec_overloaded_builtins): Remove
bogus entries for the P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_VGBBD built-ins
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c
index 1466c0c..cda0da8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c
@@ -4789,10 +4789,6 @@ const struct altivec_builtin_types
altivec_overloaded_builtins[] = {
RS6000_BTI_V16QI, RS6000_BTI_V16QI, 0, 0 },
{ P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_VGBBD, P8V_BUILTIN_VGBBD,
RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V16QI, RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V16QI, 0, 0 },
- { P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_VGBBD, P8V_BUILTIN_VGBBD,
- RS6000_BTI_V16QI, 0, 0, 0 },
- { P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_VGBBD, P8V_BUILTIN_VGBBD,
- RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V16QI, 0, 0, 0 },
{ P9V_BUILTIN_VEC_VINSERT4B, P9V_BUILTIN_VINSERT4B,
RS6000_BTI_V16QI, RS6000_BTI_V4SI,
--
1.9.1
