On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:00:19PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> On 25/01/17 14:54, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > Following patch documents new option -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope 
> > which was done for upcoming GCC 7.1.
> > 
> > Thanks for feedback,
> > Martin
> 
> +      <li>Using -O2 optimization level (and above) rewrites variables of a 
> GIMPLE
> +      type that are rewritten into SSA.  This removes shadow memory usage and
> +      results in faster code.</li>
> 
> I believe the changes page is targeted towards end users rather than GCC 
> developers
> and the above description wouldn't make much sense to them. Maybe better to 
> say:
> "Using -O2 optimization level and above improves shadow memory usage over 
> LLVM" ?

It isn't even correct, we only rewrite vars into SSA that aren't address
taken except for the implicit address taking by ASAN_MARK.  It is just an
implementation detail, I think we just should leave it out, it is up to users
to compare our and LLVM -fsanitize=address performance and what it can
report if they want.  What you should mention is that 
-fsanitize-address-use-after-scope
is on by default if -fsanitize=address and not when
-fsanitize=kernel-address.

        Jakub

Reply via email to