On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:00:19PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On 25/01/17 14:54, Martin Liška wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Following patch documents new option -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope > > which was done for upcoming GCC 7.1. > > > > Thanks for feedback, > > Martin > > + <li>Using -O2 optimization level (and above) rewrites variables of a > GIMPLE > + type that are rewritten into SSA. This removes shadow memory usage and > + results in faster code.</li> > > I believe the changes page is targeted towards end users rather than GCC > developers > and the above description wouldn't make much sense to them. Maybe better to > say: > "Using -O2 optimization level and above improves shadow memory usage over > LLVM" ?
It isn't even correct, we only rewrite vars into SSA that aren't address taken except for the implicit address taking by ASAN_MARK. It is just an implementation detail, I think we just should leave it out, it is up to users to compare our and LLVM -fsanitize=address performance and what it can report if they want. What you should mention is that -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope is on by default if -fsanitize=address and not when -fsanitize=kernel-address. Jakub