Hi,
basing on [class.friend] (11.3/3) in C++11 I think Jon is right that
cv-qualification should be ok in a friend declaration. I'm not sure,
however, if we want to somehow allow that also in c++98 mode... Tested
x86_64-linux.
Ok?
Thanks,
Paolo.
///////////////////
/cp
2011-09-21 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
PR c++/50344
* friend.c (make_friend_class): In c++0x mode, cv-qualification is
ok in a friend declaration.
/cp
2011-09-21 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
PR c++/50344
* g++.dg/cpp0x/friend3.C: New.
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/friend3.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/friend3.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/friend3.C (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/50344
+// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
+
+template <typename T> class C
+{
+ friend T;
+ int i;
+};
+
+struct S
+{
+ int f()
+ {
+ C<const S> c;
+ return c.i;
+ }
+};
Index: cp/friend.c
===================================================================
--- cp/friend.c (revision 179049)
+++ cp/friend.c (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* Help friends in C++.
Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
- 2007, 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of GCC.
@@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ make_friend_class (tree type, tree friend_type, bo
"invalid type %qT declared %<friend%>", friend_type);
return;
}
+ else if (cxx_dialect >= cxx0x)
+ friend_type = cv_unqualified (friend_type);
if (friend_depth)
/* If the TYPE is a template then it makes sense for it to be