On Jan 20 2017, Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c (revision 244691)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c (working copy)
> @@ -31,5 +31,7 @@
>
> /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "Will split live ranges of parameters" "ira"
> } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "Split live-range of register" "ira" } } */
> -/* XFAIL due to PR70681. */
> +/* The XFAILs are because these targets produce better code without
> + shrinkwrapping, and hence the optimization is not triggered. See
> + PR70681 for more details. */
> /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "Performing shrink-wrapping"
> "pro_and_epilogue" { xfail arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* } } } */
Shouldn't that rather be target { ! { arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* } }?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
