OK.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While DW_AT_data_bit_offset has been introduced already in DWARF4, GDB only
> gained support for it last November, so I think it is better to enable this
> only for -gdwarf-5 for now and we can reconsider it in a year or two.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2017-01-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR debug/71669
> * dwarf2out.c (add_data_member_location_attribute): For constant
> offset bitfield emit for -gdwarf-5 DW_AT_data_bit_offset attribute
> instead of DW_AT_data_member_location, DW_AT_bit_offset and
> DW_AT_byte_size attributes.
>
> --- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj 2017-01-11 19:05:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2017-01-12 15:08:29.842773537 +0100
> @@ -18272,6 +18272,23 @@ add_data_member_location_attribute (dw_d
>
> if (! loc_descr)
> {
> + /* While DW_AT_data_bit_offset has been added already in DWARF4,
> + e.g. GDB only added support to it in November 2016. For DWARF5
> + we need newer debug info consumers anyway. We might change this
> + to dwarf_version >= 4 once most consumers catched up. */
> + if (dwarf_version >= 5
> + && TREE_CODE (decl) == FIELD_DECL
> + && DECL_BIT_FIELD_TYPE (decl))
> + {
> + tree off = bit_position (decl);
> + if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (off) && get_AT (die, DW_AT_bit_size))
> + {
> + remove_AT (die, DW_AT_byte_size);
> + remove_AT (die, DW_AT_bit_offset);
> + add_AT_unsigned (die, DW_AT_data_bit_offset, tree_to_uhwi
> (off));
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> if (dwarf_version > 2)
> {
> /* Don't need to output a location expression, just the constant. */
>
> Jakub
