On 15 January 2017 at 18:42, Tim Song <t.canens....@gmail.com> wrote: > On rereading the patch today, the size calculation for merge() appears > to be backwards. [__first2, __last2) consists of the nodes not > transferred into *this, so the new size of __x should be __dist while > this->size() should be incremented by (__orig_size - __dist).
Ah, yes, I'm an idiot. Fixing...
