GCC maintainers:
The following patch fixes an issue with the builtin test test_ne_long().
The issue is the arguments need to be "bool long long" not "bool long"
to get the correct 64-bit value when running in 32-bit mode.
The patch has been tested on:
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 7 64-bit, 32-bit) with no
regressions.
Is this OK for trunk?
Carl Love
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-01-13 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com>
* gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p9.c (test_ne_long()):
Test fails in 32-bit mode because the arguments are of type
"bool long" not "bool long long". The arguments need to be
"bool long long" to get a correct 64-bit value in 32-bit mode.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p9.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p9.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p9.c
index d846e29..e3db2da 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p9.c
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ test_ne_int (vector bool int x, vector bool int y)
return vec_cmpne (x, y);
}
-vector bool long
-test_ne_long (vector bool long x, vector bool long y)
+vector bool long long
+test_ne_long (vector bool long long x, vector bool long long y)
{
return vec_cmpne (x, y);
}
--
1.8.3.1
