Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 09/20/2011 03:23 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Jason Merrill<ja...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>> Certainly all the calls to tokens_buff_add_token pass src->src_loc for
>>> the second. So why don't we look up the second location in the macro
>>> definition when we need it rather than store a copy in the map?
>>
>> Because when you have the first location, looking up the second is not
>> easy.
>
> In linemap_macro_map_loc_to_def_point you get the token number and
> then use that to index into MACRO_MAP_LOCATIONS. Can't you use the
> same token number to index into macro->exp.tokens instead?
No, because a macro argument can be made of several tokens. So after
the first macro parameter of the replacement-list has been replaced by
the tokens of the argument, there is a shift between the indexes of the
tokens resulting from the replacement, and the original tokens of the
macro replacement list.
--
Dodji
