On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:35:32PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
It also lacks expressiveness when comparing
short s;
s_1 = (short) 1;
s_2 = short (1);
IMHO having a _Literal somewhere makes it more obvious what is meant
(I'm still going to dump 1u or 1l instead of _Literal (unsigned) 1
of course as that's even more easy to recognize).
So, with the _Literal (type) constant syntax, what are we going to emit
and parse for __int128 constants?
_Literal (__int128) (0x123456ULL << 64 || 0x123456ULL), something else?
Yes, unless we teach libcpp about larger than 64bit literals.
Teaching libcpp about 128bit literals sounds like a much nicer idea
indeed...
--
Marc Glisse
