On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > Rather than implicit RejectNegative it might be better to just diagnose > > > such options as invalid. If you agree, I can implement that as follow-up. > > > Also note that RejectNegative is only needed on the Enum switches that > > > have > > > the default negatives (that is [Wfm] prefixed I think). > > > > That would be nice. > > This works (and r244071 fails to build with it, r244072 succeeds). > The error is emitted above the option, so it is not hard to find out what > option it is (and it is similar to other similar errors diagnosed by > optc-gen.awk). > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? > > 2017-01-04 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > * optc-gen.awk: Emit #error for -W*/-f*/-m* Enum without > RejectNegative.
OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
