Hi Jonathan, On 4 January 2017 at 12:02, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/01/17 15:32 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> Here's what I plan to commit to trunk tomorrow. > > > Committed to trunk. > > After this commit (r244051), I do see improvements, but also a few new failures. The big picture is at http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/244051/report-build-info.html
Where the expected improvements for arm-none-eabi, with default cpu&fpu are: http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/244051/arm-none-eabi/diff-libstdc++-rh60-arm-none-eabi-default-default-default.txt New failures appear when forcing -march=armv5t in runtestflags (the 3 red items in the 1st report): - FAIL appears [ => FAIL]: 18_support/exception_ptr/60612-terminate.cc execution test 18_support/exception_ptr/60612-unexpected.cc execution test 30_threads/packaged_task/members/at_thread_exit.cc execution test 30_threads/promise/members/at_thread_exit.cc execution test Note that in these cases we are compiling the test cases with -march=armv5t, but link with libraries built --with-cpu=cortex-a9, so there might be a mismatch? Christophe
