On 29/12/16 22:10 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 29 December 2016 at 21:57, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:
Instead of repeating this condition half a dozen times, we could put
it in the __uniq_ptr_impl class template and reuse it, as in the
attached patch (and similarly for the unique_ptr<t[]> specialization).
What do you think?
It needs to be a bit more dependent than in that patch, I think. I
adjusted the idea a bit,
a new patch attached. It cleans up the code a bit, so it's better, but
not a huge improvement.
Gets a bit better by keeping the __uniq_ptr_impl as just an enable_if,
aliasing its ::type locally
and then using the result in the constraints. Also gets rid of a bunch
of dg-errors in
ptr_deleter_neg.cc. This makes me quite happy. The attached _3.diff
shows the cleanup,
the _4.diff shows the full patch with this cleanup applied.
Looks good. OK for trunk, thanks.
