Hi!

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:45:03PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Note that you can write (shift @0 SSA_NAME@1) in the pattern instead of a
> > separate test.
> 
> That is what I tried first, but there is some bug in genmatch.c that
> prevents it.  The:
>  (for vec (VECTOR_CST CONSTRUCTOR)
>   (simplify
>    (shiftrotate @0 vec@1)
> results in case SSA_NAME: being added to a switch:
>     case SSA_NAME:
>       if (do_valueize (valueize, op1) != NULL_TREE)
>         {
>           gimple *def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (op1);
>           if (gassign *def = dyn_cast <gassign *> (def_stmt))
>             switch (gimple_assign_rhs_code (def))
>               {
>               case CONSTRUCTOR:
> and the SSA_NAME@1 in another simplification resulted in another
>     case SSA_NAME:
> into the same switch (rather than appending to the case SSA_NAME).

And here is the corresponding updated version of the patch:

2016-12-29  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/71563
        * match.pd: Simplify X << Y into X if Y is known to be 0 or
        out of range value - has low bits known to be zero.

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71563.c: New test.

--- gcc/match.pd.jj     2016-12-21 10:00:10.809244456 +0100
+++ gcc/match.pd        2016-12-29 21:56:56.891858831 +0100
@@ -1515,6 +1515,21 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
     (if (tem)
      (shiftrotate @0 { tem; }))))))
 
+/* Simplify X << Y where Y's low width bits are 0 to X, as only valid
+   Y is 0.  Similarly for X >> Y.  */
+#if GIMPLE
+(for shift (lshift rshift)
+ (simplify
+  (shift @0 SSA_NAME@1)
+   (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@1)))
+    (with {
+      int width = ceil_log2 (element_precision (TREE_TYPE (@0)));
+      int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@1));
+     }
+     (if ((get_nonzero_bits (@1) & wi::mask (width, false, prec)) == 0)
+      @0)))))
+#endif
+
 /* Rewrite an LROTATE_EXPR by a constant into an
    RROTATE_EXPR by a new constant.  */
 (simplify
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71563.c.jj  2016-12-29 21:56:12.668414342 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71563.c     2016-12-29 21:56:12.668414342 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/71563 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+void link_error (void);
+
+void
+foo (int k)
+{
+  int t = 1 << ((1 / k) << 8);
+  if (t != 1)
+    link_error ();
+}
+
+void
+bar (int k, int l)
+{
+  int t = l << (k << 8);
+  if (t != l)
+    link_error ();
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "link_error" "optimized" } } */


        Jakub

Reply via email to