On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 16:49, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On 11-09-16 16:40 , Mike Stump wrote: >> >> On Sep 16, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >>> >>> I would like to push this libgomp patch upstream. We need it to pass >>> sysroot to GCC when testing libgomp. >> >> I'd be curious if Ian likes this... Can one still set GCC_UNDER_TEST in >> the site.exp file or do other unholy things with it after your patch? I'm >> thinking about things like in tree testing v out of tree testing. >> > I don't see why not. The patch does not re-set GCC_UNDER_TEST, it just uses > it whole instead of getting the compiler part. But I think I'm missing your > point.
Never mind. I see what you mean now.
