Hi
I have been reported privately by Christophe in copy a regression
resulting from my recent changes to _Rb_tree. I removed a constructor
still necessary in C++03 mode or before. Tests would have shown it if I
had run them in C++03.
* include/bits/stl_tree.h
(_Rb_tree_impl(const _Key_compare&, const _Node_allocator&): Restore
before C++11 mode.
I prefer to restore it only before C++11 while it used to be
available in any mode. It is only call with rvalue references. Don't
hesitate to commit it yourself if you prefer to fix it quickly otherwise
I'll do it after validation in about 24 hours.
François
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h
index 1bfbfa7..cb2c116 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h
@@ -692,7 +692,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
, _Base_key_compare(__x._M_key_compare)
{ }
-#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+ _Rb_tree_impl(const _Key_compare& __comp, const _Node_allocator& __a)
+ : _Node_allocator(__a), _Base_key_compare(__comp)
+ { }
+#else
_Rb_tree_impl(_Rb_tree_impl&&) = default;
_Rb_tree_impl(const _Key_compare& __comp, _Node_allocator&& __a)
: _Node_allocator(std::move(__a)), _Base_key_compare(__comp)
