OK.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
> following discussion on the ABI list, here's an update to the generic lambda
> demangler patch.
>
> The guts of the patch are the same as before -- note when we're printing a
> generic lambda's parms and interpret template type parm references
> differently.  however:
> 1) don't refer to this as a mangling bug, because it isn't
> 2) add a ':$n' suffix to each generic parm, as that's how g++ itself shows
> them in diagnostics and the like.
>
> I'll mark 78621 as not a bug too.
>
> ok?
>
> nathan
>
> --
> Nathan Sidwell

Reply via email to