On 21/06/16 15:16, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > Hello, > > After some changes to GCC this test no longer tests the desired code > generation behavior. The generated assembly is better than it used to > be, but it has become too smart. I add an extra parameter to make sure > GCC can't optimize away the loop. > > Tested for arm-none-eabi-gcc with a Cortex-M3 target. > > Is this OK? > > Cheers, > Andre > > gcc/ChangeLog > 2016-06-21 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> > > * gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-2.c: Update testcase. >
Ping.
