On 12/12/16 10:44, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Same as for PR77933, I'm trying to get this in for the next GCC 6 release.
I've successfully done a Thumb-1 bootstrap of the backport and testsuite shows
no regression when run with an arm-none-eabi GCC cross-compiler targeting ARM
Cortex-M0.
Is this ok for gcc-6-branch?
Given this has been in trunk for some time, is specific to Thumb-1 and fixes a
wrong-code issue this is ok.
Thanks,
Kyrill
Best regards,
Thomas
On 06/12/16 11:38, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 30/11/16 10:44, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Sorry, the bug cannot be reproduced on gcc-5-branch so it's probably better to
only do a backport to gcc-6-branch.
Ok for a backport to gcc-6-branch?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 30/11/16 10:42, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
Is this ok to backport to gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch? Patch applies cleanly
(patches attached for reference).
2016-11-30 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
Backport from mainline
2016-11-22 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
gcc/
PR target/77904
* config/arm/arm.c (thumb1_compute_save_reg_mask): Mark frame pointer
in save register mask if it is needed.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/77904
* gcc.target/arm/pr77904.c: New test.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 22/11/16 10:45, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
On 17/11/16 09:11, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 17/11/16 08:56, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
On 16/11/16 10:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 03/11/16 16:52, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
When using a callee-saved register to save the frame pointer the Thumb-1
prologue fails to save the callee-saved register before that. For ARM and
Thumb-2 targets the frame pointer is handled as a special case but
nothing is
done for Thumb-1 targets. This patch adds the same logic for Thumb-1
targets.
ChangeLog entries are as follow:
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2016-11-02 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
PR target/77904
* config/arm/arm.c (thumb1_compute_save_reg_mask): mark frame
pointer
in save register mask if it is needed.
s/mark/Mark/
*** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
2016-11-02 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
PR target/77904
* gcc.target/arm/pr77904.c: New test.
Testing: Testsuite shows no regression when run with arm-none-eabi GCC
cross-compiler for Cortex-M0 target.
Is this ok for trunk?
I'd ask for a bootstrap, but this code is Thumb-1 only so it wouldn't affect
anything.
I can bootstrap for armv4t with --with-mode=thumb which would at least
exercise the path. I'll try such a bootstrap on qemu.
If you can get it to work, then yes please.
Bootstrap came back clean so I've committed the patch (r242693). Thanks!
Best regards,
Thomas
