On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com> wrote: > For flexible array members, because they're not in C++, we get to > make up the rules that make the most sense to us. IMO, they should > fit in well with the rest of the language.
I disagree; we should support C code, but flexible arrays don't really fit with the C++ object model, so I don't think trying to do anything clever with them in constructors is worthwhile. Jason
