Hi!

For VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P vectype the element type can have different
precision from TYPE_SIZE, which is what we use for the bitsize.
The following patch uses then some other integral type of that precision
before it is actually converted to lhs_type (boolean_type_node).

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-12-05  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/78675
        * tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_live_operation): For
        VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P vectype use integral type with bitsize precision
        instead of TREE_TYPE (vectype) for the BIT_FIELD_REF.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr78675-1.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/i386/pr78675-2.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree-vect-loop.c.jj     2016-11-16 18:51:58.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-loop.c        2016-12-05 10:58:59.175857316 +0100
@@ -6601,8 +6601,10 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (gimple *stm
   /* Create a new vectorized stmt for the uses of STMT and insert outside the
      loop.  */
   gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
-  tree new_tree = build3 (BIT_FIELD_REF, TREE_TYPE (vectype), vec_lhs, bitsize,
-                         bitstart);
+  tree bftype = TREE_TYPE (vectype);
+  if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (vectype))
+    bftype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (tree_to_uhwi (bitsize), 1);
+  tree new_tree = build3 (BIT_FIELD_REF, bftype, vec_lhs, bitsize, bitstart);
   new_tree = force_gimple_operand (fold_convert (lhs_type, new_tree), &stmts,
                                   true, NULL_TREE);
   if (stmts)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78675.c.jj    2016-12-05 
11:11:27.497407240 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78675.c       2016-12-05 
11:10:44.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/78675 */
+
+long int a;
+
+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) long int
+foo (long int x)
+{
+  long int b;
+  while (a < 1)
+    {
+      b = a && x;
+      ++a;
+    }
+  return b;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  if (foo (0) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  a = 0;
+  if (foo (1) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  a = 0;
+  if (foo (25) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  a = -64;
+  if (foo (0) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  a = -64;
+  if (foo (1) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  a = -64;
+  if (foo (25) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr78675-1.c.jj        2016-12-05 
11:11:27.497407240 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr78675-1.c   2016-12-05 11:10:44.000000000 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/78675 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -mavx512f" } */
+
+#include "../../gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78675.c"
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr78675-2.c.jj        2016-12-05 
11:13:48.131631261 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr78675-2.c   2016-12-05 11:14:00.582474027 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -mavx512f" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target avx512f } */
+
+#include "avx512f-check.h"
+
+#define main do_main
+
+#include "../../gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78675.c"
+
+static void
+avx512f_test (void)
+{
+  do_main ();
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to