On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 02:36:54PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 1799 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 1799 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldic 415 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldic-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+sldi 29 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 4471 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+mr 873 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldimi 1744 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rotldi 54 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 4045 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+mr 447 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rldimi-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldimi 892 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 9730 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldicl 3095 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rlwinm 3094 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+srdi 12 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 9606 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldic 2946 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rlwinm 622 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-1.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+slwi 1 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+[a-z] 9466 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rldic 2840 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+rlwinm 721 > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\s+srdi 12
This is PR78638. Segher
