Hi Jerry, Tests with multiple images go into the opencoarrays testsuite. Still to push though. The tests I have so far all pass.
- Andre Am 30. November 2016 00:06:22 MEZ, schrieb Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net>: >On 11/28/2016 10:33 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: >> PING! >> >> I know it's a lengthy patch, but comments would be nice anyway. >> >> - Andre >> >> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:46:50 +0100 >> Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> attached patch addresses the need of extending the API of the >caf-libs to >>> enable allocatable components asynchronous allocation. Allocatable >components >>> in derived type coarrays are different from regular coarrays or >coarrayed >>> components. The latter have to be allocated on all images or on >none. >>> Furthermore is the allocation a point of synchronisation. >>> >>> For allocatable components the F2008 allows to have some allocated >on some >>> images and on others not. Furthermore is the registration with the >caf-lib, >>> that an allocatable component is present in a derived type coarray >no longer a >>> synchronisation point. To implement these features two new types of >coarray >>> registration have been introduced. The first one just registering >the >>> component with the caf-lib and the latter doing the allocate. >Furthermore has >>> the caf-API been extended to provide a query function to learn about >the >>> allocation status of a component on a remote image. >>> >>> Sorry, that the patch is rather lengthy. Most of this is due to the >>> structure_alloc_comps' signature change. The routine and its >wrappers are used >>> rather often which needed the appropriate changes. >>> >>> I know I left two or three TODOs in the patch to remind me of things >I have to >>> investigate further. For the current state these TODOs are no reason >to hold >>> back the patch. The third party library opencoarrays implements the >mpi-part >>> of the caf-model and will change in sync. It would of course be >advantageous >>> to just have to say: With gcc-7 gfortran implements allocatable >components in >>> derived coarrays nearly completely. >>> >>> I know we are in stage 3. But the patch bootstraps and regtests ok >on >>> x86_64-linux/F23. So, is it ok for trunk or shall it go to 7.2? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andre >> >> > >Patch applies OK, regression tested OK here, test cases look >reasonable. Have >you been able to test with multiple images? > >Jerry -- Andre Vehreschild * Kreuzherrenstr. 8 * 52062 Aachen Tel.: +49 241 929 10 18 * ve...@gmx.de
