On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after discussing this with Honza, we have decided that scheduling an
> extra pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges after pass_fixup_cfg is the correct
> way to keep the cgraph consistent with gimple IL when early IPA passes
> need it, such as is the case with the testcase in PR 70965.
>
> While needing an extra pass is never nice, this is a consequence of
> splitting pass_build_ssa_passes out of early optimization passes so
> that pass_chkp can be in between.
>
> The patch below fices the ICE in PR 70965 and has passed bootstrap and
> testing on x86_64-linux.  OK for trunk?

Ok.

Richard.

> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
>
> 2016-11-24  Martin Jambor  <mjam...@suse.cz>
>
> gcc/
>         * passes.def (pass_build_ssa_passes): Add pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>         * g++.dg/pr70965.C: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/passes.def                 |  1 +
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
> index 85a5af0..5faf17f 100644
> --- a/gcc/passes.def
> +++ b/gcc/passes.def
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>    NEXT_PASS (pass_build_ssa_passes);
>    PUSH_INSERT_PASSES_WITHIN (pass_build_ssa_passes)
>        NEXT_PASS (pass_fixup_cfg);
> +      NEXT_PASS (pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges);
>        NEXT_PASS (pass_build_ssa);
>        NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_nonnull_compare);
>        NEXT_PASS (pass_ubsan);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d8a2c35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c++11" } */
> +
> +struct A {};
> +struct B {};
> +struct C { using p = int *; template <typename> using ra = A; };
> +struct J : C { template <typename> struct K { typedef C::ra<int> o; }; };
> +template <typename> struct D
> +{
> +  struct H : J::K<int>::o { H (J::p, A) : J::K<int>::o () {} };
> +  H d;
> +  D (const char *, const A &x = A ()) : d (0, x) {}
> +};
> +extern template class D<char>;
> +enum L { M };
> +struct F { virtual char *foo (); };
> +template <class> struct I : B { static int foo (int) {} };
> +struct G { typedef I<int> t; };
> +void foo (int) { G::t::foo (0); }
> +void bar (const D<char> &, const D<int> &, int, L);
> +void baz () try { foo (0); } catch (F &e) { bar (e.foo (), "", 0, M); }
> --
> 2.10.2
>

Reply via email to