On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> If this just isn't something that should be documented in changes.html
> please let me know and I'll stop pinging.
Not at all! Apologies for not getting back to you earlier, I
am simply swamped with (non-GCC) stuff right now, and missed
this on my weekend.
This is great and important to have documented, let me just add
an observation or two:
Index: htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html
===================================================================
+<li>The <code>-Wshadow</code> warning has been split into 3
I believe for small numbers one usually spells them out ("three"
instead of "3").
+type is compatible (in C++ compatible means that the type of the
+shadowing variable can be converted to that of the shadowed variable).
+
+The following example shows the different kinds of shadow
+warnings:<blockquote><pre>
Take care, what looks like a paragraph between the two above will
just show up as a blank when rendered as HTML. If you want to
retain the paragraph, use <p>...</p>.
Kudos for coming up with such a short, innocently looking example! :-)
Gerald
