On 08/11/16 13:36, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?

Best regards,

Thomas

On 25/10/16 18:07, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,

Currently when a user compiles for a thumb-only target (such as Cortex-M
processors) without specifying the -mthumb option GCC throws the error "target
CPU does not support ARM mode". This is suboptimal from a usability point of
view: the -mthumb could be deduced from the -march or -mcpu option when there is
no ambiguity.

This patch implements this behavior by extending the DRIVER_SELF_SPECS to
automatically append -mthumb to the command line for thumb-only targets. It does
so by checking the last -march option if any is given or the last -mcpu option
otherwise. There is no ordering issue because conflicting -mcpu and -march is
already handled.

Note that the logic cannot be implemented in function arm_option_override
because we need to provide the modified command line to the GCC driver for
finding the right multilib path and the function arm_option_override is executed
too late for that effect.

ChangeLog entries are as follow:

*** gcc/ChangeLog ***

2016-10-18  Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
            Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>

        PR target/64802
        * common/config/arm/arm-common.c (arm_target_thumb_only): New function.
        * config/arm/arm-opts.h: Include arm-flags.h.
        (struct arm_arch_core_flag): Define.
        (arm_arch_core_flags): Define.
        * config/arm/arm-protos.h: Include arm-flags.h.
        (FL_NONE, FL_ANY, FL_CO_PROC, FL_ARCH3M, FL_MODE26, FL_MODE32,
        FL_ARCH4, FL_ARCH5, FL_THUMB, FL_LDSCHED, FL_STRONG, FL_ARCH5E,
        FL_XSCALE, FL_ARCH6, FL_VFPV2, FL_WBUF, FL_ARCH6K, FL_THUMB2, FL_NOTM,
        FL_THUMB_DIV, FL_VFPV3, FL_NEON, FL_ARCH7EM, FL_ARCH7, FL_ARM_DIV,
        FL_ARCH8, FL_CRC32, FL_SMALLMUL, FL_NO_VOLATILE_CE, FL_IWMMXT,
        FL_IWMMXT2, FL_ARCH6KZ, FL2_ARCH8_1, FL2_ARCH8_2, FL2_FP16INST,
        FL_TUNE, FL_FOR_ARCH2, FL_FOR_ARCH3, FL_FOR_ARCH3M, FL_FOR_ARCH4,
        FL_FOR_ARCH4T, FL_FOR_ARCH5, FL_FOR_ARCH5T, FL_FOR_ARCH5E,
        FL_FOR_ARCH5TE, FL_FOR_ARCH5TEJ, FL_FOR_ARCH6, FL_FOR_ARCH6J,
        FL_FOR_ARCH6K, FL_FOR_ARCH6Z, FL_FOR_ARCH6ZK, FL_FOR_ARCH6KZ,
        FL_FOR_ARCH6T2, FL_FOR_ARCH6M, FL_FOR_ARCH7, FL_FOR_ARCH7A,
        FL_FOR_ARCH7VE, FL_FOR_ARCH7R, FL_FOR_ARCH7M, FL_FOR_ARCH7EM,
        FL_FOR_ARCH8A, FL2_FOR_ARCH8_1A, FL2_FOR_ARCH8_2A, FL_FOR_ARCH8M_BASE,
        FL_FOR_ARCH8M_MAIN, arm_feature_set, ARM_FSET_MAKE,
        ARM_FSET_MAKE_CPU1, ARM_FSET_MAKE_CPU2, ARM_FSET_CPU1, ARM_FSET_CPU2,
        ARM_FSET_EMPTY, ARM_FSET_ANY, ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU1, ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU2,
        ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU, ARM_FSET_ADD_CPU1, ARM_FSET_ADD_CPU2,
        ARM_FSET_DEL_CPU1, ARM_FSET_DEL_CPU2, ARM_FSET_UNION, ARM_FSET_INTER,
        ARM_FSET_XOR, ARM_FSET_EXCLUDE, ARM_FSET_IS_EMPTY,
        ARM_FSET_CPU_SUBSET): Move to ...
        * config/arm/arm-flags.h: This new file.
        * config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_MODE_SPEC_FUNCTIONS): Define.
        (EXTRA_SPEC_FUNCTIONS): Add TARGET_MODE_SPEC_FUNCTIONS to its value.
        (TARGET_MODE_SPECS): Define.
        (DRIVER_SELF_SPECS): Add TARGET_MODE_SPECS to its value.


*** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***

2016-10-11  Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>

        PR target/64802
        * gcc.target/arm/optional_thumb-1.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/arm/optional_thumb-2.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/arm/optional_thumb-3.c: New test.


No regression when running the testsuite for -mcpu=cortex-m0 -mthumb,
-mcpu=cortex-m0 -marm and -mcpu=cortex-a8 -marm

Is this ok for trunk?


This looks like a useful usability improvement.
This is ok after a bootstrap on an arm-none-linux-gnueabihf target.

Sorry for the delay,
Kyrill


Best regards,

Thomas

Reply via email to