PING^2 On 10/31/2016 10:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > PING^1 > > On 10/13/2016 05:34 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >> Hello. >> >> As it's very hard to guess from GCC driver whether a target supports atomic >> updates >> for GCOV counter or not, I decided to come up with a new option value >> (maybe-atomic), >> that would be transformed in a corresponding value (single or atomic) in >> tree-profile.c. >> The GCC driver selects the option when -pthread is present in the command >> line. >> >> That should fix all tests failures seen on AIX target. >> >> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests. >> >> Ready to be installed? >> Martin >>
- [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=maybe-atomic Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=maybe-atomic Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=maybe-atomi... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=maybe-a... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=may... David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-updat... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=may... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-updat... David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-u... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofi... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofi... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofi... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce -fprofile-update=may... Nathan Sidwell