> Hi, > > > On 04/11/16 04:36, Martin Jambor wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:03:47PM +1100, kugan wrote: > >> > >>...snip... > >> > >>I have also separated the constant parameter conversion out and posted as > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02309.html. This is now > >>handling just unary pass-through jump functions. > >> > >>Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new > >>regressions. > >> > >>Is this OK for trunk? > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Kugan > >> > >>gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > >> > >>2016-10-28 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org> > >> > >> * gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c: New test. > >> > >> > >>gcc/ChangeLog: > >> > >>2016-10-28 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org> > >> > >> * ipa-cp.c (ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result): Handle unary expressions. > >> (propagate_vr_accross_jump_function): Likewise. > >> * ipa-prop.c (ipa_set_jf_unary_pass_through): New. > >> (load_from_param_1): New. > >> (load_from_unmodified_param): Factor common part into load_from_param_1. > >> (load_from_param): New. > >> (compute_complex_assign_jump_func): Handle unary expressions. > >> (ipa_write_jump_function): Likewise. > >> (ipa_read_jump_function): Likewise. > >> > >> > >>>Patch is OK with changes Martin suggested. > >>> > >>>Honza > >>> > > > >>From b7d9b413951ba20d156a7801640cc7d7bc57c062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>From: Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> > >>Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:16:38 +1100 > >>Subject: [PATCH 2/2] add unary jump function > >> > >>--- > >> gcc/ipa-cp.c | 39 +++++++++++++++--- > >> gcc/ipa-prop.c | 89 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c | 32 +++++++++++++++ > >> 3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c > >> > >>diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.c b/gcc/ipa-cp.c > >>index 9f28557..8fc95dd 100644 > >>--- a/gcc/ipa-cp.c > >>+++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.c > >>@@ -1225,13 +1225,21 @@ ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result (struct > >>ipa_jump_func *jfunc, tree input) > >> return NULL_TREE; > >> > >> if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (ipa_get_jf_pass_through_operation (jfunc)) > >>- == tcc_comparison) > >>- restype = boolean_type_node; > >>+ == tcc_unary) > >>+ { > >>+ res = fold_unary (ipa_get_jf_pass_through_operation (jfunc), > >>+ TREE_TYPE (input), input); > >>+ } > > > >Please do not put curly braces around a single statement. Apart from > >that, no objection from me. > > Thanks Martin, I will fix this. > > Honza, is this OK for you with the above fix?
OK, thanks! Honza > > Thanks, > Kugan > > > >Thanks, > > > >Martin > >
