Hi Paul, > The patch is OK for trunk.
thanks a lot. Will commit soon. > PS While you are with us, are you intending to deal with the 14 PRs > for which you are the assignee or will you unassign yourself? Good point. I will look through them and see what I can do. In fact I might have a bit of time for gfortran hacking in the coming weeks, but I cannot promise anything .... Cheers, Janus > On 5 November 2016 at 10:15, Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> here is a patch that I had submitted already in February (see >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00011.html). Unfortunately >> it was never approved and I got distracted with other things and >> forgot about it. >> >> It's a diagnostics patch, which makes sure that the responsible flag >> is printed in several warning messages (for which this was still >> missing). As a small extra the patch also mentions the -Wpedantic flag >> in the gfortran documentation. >> >> Fortunately the patch still applies cleanly and regtests without >> failures on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk? >> >> Cheers, >> Janus >> >> >> 2016-11-05 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> >> Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <m...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/69495 >> * invoke.texi: Mention -Wpedantic as an alias of -pedantic. >> * check.c (gfc_check_transfer): Mention responsible flag in warning >> message. >> * frontend-passes.c (do_warn_function_elimination): Ditto. >> * resolve.c (resolve_elemental_actual): Ditto. >> (resolve_operator): Ditto. >> (warn_unused_fortran_label): Ditto. >> * trans-common.c (translate_common): Ditto. >> >> >> 2016-11-05 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> >> Dominique d'Humieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr> >> >> PR fortran/69495 >> * gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_6.f90: Use -Wpedantic flag. > > > > -- > The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits. > > Albert Einstein
