On 11/02/16 07:11, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 11/01/16 19:15, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 11/01/16 18:11, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Bernd Edlinger
>>> <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote:
>>>> On 11/01/16 16:20, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>>> On 10/17/2016 03:18 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>>> I'm not even sure we need a new warning. Can we combine this warning
>>>>> with the block that currently follows?
>>>>
>>>> After 20 years of not having a warning on that,
>>>> an implicitly enabled warning would at least break lots of bogus
>>>> test cases.
>>>
>>> Would it, though? Which test cases still break with the current patch?
>>>
>>
>> Less than before, but there are still at least a few of them.
>>
>> I can make a list and send it tomorrow.
>>
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-udt.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-xudt.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/init/new15.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/init/new15.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/init/new15.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/inline-1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/inline-1.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/inline-1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/inline-2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/inline-2.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/inline-2.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tc1/dr20.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tc1/dr20.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tc1/dr20.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/inline-1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/inline-1.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/inline-1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/inline-2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/inline-2.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/inline-2.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-1 cp_lto_20080908-1_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
> -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-1 cp_lto_20080908-1_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
> -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-1 cp_lto_20080908-1_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
> -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-1 cp_lto_20080908-1_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
> -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-1 cp_lto_20080908-1_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
> -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-1 cp_lto_20080908-1_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
> -fuse-linker-plugin
> FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr68811 cp_lto_pr68811_0.o assemble, -O2
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/except1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/except1.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/except1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p700.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p700.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p700.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins10.C -std=c++11 (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins10.C -std=c++14 (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/realloc.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/realloc.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/realloc.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/vbase5.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/vbase5.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/vbase5.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
>
>
> The lto test case does emit the warning when assembling, but
> it still produces an executable and even executes it.
>
> Also g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-udt.C, g++.dg/tc1/dr20.C
> and g++.old-deja/g++.other/vbase5.C are execution tests.
>
> So I was wrong to assume these were all compile-only tests.
>
> I think that list should be fixable, if we decide to enable
> the warning by default.
>
Aehm, sorry. I forgot to look at other languages...
=== obj-c++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/lto/trivial-1 obj_cpp_lto_trivial-1_0.o assemble, -O0
-flto -fg
nu-runtime
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/lto/trivial-1 obj_cpp_lto_trivial-1_0.o assemble, -O2
-flto -fg
nu-runtime
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/lto/trivial-1 obj_cpp_lto_trivial-1_0.o assemble, -O0
-flto -fl
to-partition=none -fgnu-runtime
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/lto/trivial-1 obj_cpp_lto_trivial-1_0.o assemble, -O2
-flto -fl
to-partition=none -fgnu-runtime
=== libitm tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libitm.c++/dropref.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libitm.c++/throwdown.C (test for excess errors)
Bernd.
