On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Benedikt Huber > <benedikt.hu...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In the aarch64 backend we would need VARIANT field in AARCH64_CORE to >> specify and detect >> variants of xgene. >> >> I found this patch of Andrew Pinski >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02148.html >> >> However it did not find its way to trunk. >> Why was that the case? > > Because the full patch set has not been reviewed .... Parts of it was > reviewed back and parts in the last few weeks :). > >> What is the correct way to proceed when (re)using this patch for submission? >> Is that possible at all? > > I was in the process of resubmitting that patch set. In fact I was > able to commit patches 1, 2 and 4 already. patch 3 was resubmitted 5 > days ago: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01855.html > > I hope someone will approve it and then I will resubmit the last patch > which adds the variant portion. > > The patch set does not apply directly any more as one variable name has > changed.
I committed that one and submitted the final patch which you pointed out was not committed yet: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00072.html Thanks, Andrew > > Thanks, > Andrew > > >> >> Thank you and best regards, >> Benedikt >>
