On 08/31/2011 09:56 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+ /* So if we are parsing a friend template declaration, then
+ we should make sure that looking up the name of the
+ declaration doesn't schedule it for type access checking
+ at the time of instantiation of the current containing
+ template class, if any. */
+ cp_no_type_access_check_p = is_friend;
Why does this need to be handled differently from non-template friends?
Perhaps the template type access checking code should be adjusted to use
the existing deferred access checking code in semantics.c:
push_deferring_access_checks and such.
Jason
