On 10/20/2016 09:28 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
The current code suppose targetm.stack_protect_fail always generate
something.
But in case one target start to generate NULL_TREE, there will be ICE.
This
patch adds a simple sanity check to only call expand if it's not NULL_TREE.
OK for trunk?
gcc/
2016-10-20 Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@arm.com>
* function.c (stack_protect_epilogue): Only expands
targetm.stack_protect_fail if it's not NULL_TREE.
Is there some reason we don't want to issue an error here and stop
compilation? I'm not at all comfortable silently ignoring failure to
generate stack protector code.
jeff
