Hi Richard,
On 19/10/16 19:23, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
Hi,
While computing jump function value range for pointer, I am wondering if we
can assume that any tree with ADDR_EXPR will be nonnull.
That is, in cases like:
int arr[10];
foo (&arr[1]);
OR
struct st
{
int a;
int b;
};
struct st s2;
foo (&s2.a);
Attached patch tries to do this. I am not sure if this can be wrong. Any
thoughts?
It can be wrong for weak symbols for example.
Would excluding weak symbols (I believe I can check DECL_WEAK for this)
good enough. Or looking for acceptable subset would work?
Thanks,
Kugan
Richard.
Attached patch bootstraps and regression testing didn't introduce any new
regressions.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge): Set
value range to nonull for ADDR_EXPR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* gcc.dg/ipa/vrp5.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/ipa/vrp6.c: New test.