Hi Paul, > For reasons I don't understand, sometimes the expression type comes > through as BT_DERIVED, whilst the symbol is BT_CLASS. I could repair > this in resolve.c(fixup_array_ref) if you think that would be cleaner.
I think that I figured the rule: - when no _class-ref is present, then the type is BT_CLASS, - as soon as a _class-ref is present the type is BT_DERIVED. There is an attr.is_class. Would that be an alternative? I don't know how reliable it is set. > > I am regression testing my polymorhpic class patch at the moment, therefore > > I can't test. > > OK - I can wait. I have quite a few other things to do :-( I found an error in my patch that only manifests itself with an optimization level great than 0. Now I am searching, never having done anything there. - Andre -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
