On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> <senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Richard Biener writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> >> <senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The fix for PR 52085 went into trunk when trunk was 6.0. I ran into the
> >>> same issue on a gcc 5.x and found that the fix didn't get backported.
> >>>
> >>> Bootstrapped and reg tested below patch with x86-64-pc-linux. Ok to
> >>> backport to gcc-5-branch?
> >>
> >> Ok with me but please double-check there was no fallout.
> >
> > I boostrapped and ran against x86_64-pc-linux again, just to be sure.
> > No regressions.
>
> I meant fallout only fixed with followup patches. ISTR some in that area
> but I might confuse it with another patch. Marek might remember.
I don't remember any fallout here (and a quick look at the ML around that
time doesn't reveal any).
Marek
