On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:47:07AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 10/12/16 09:43, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > ITYM lines 197 -> 203. I.e. remove the entire if that;s inside the 'mode > > > == > > > 0' branch and make line 203 unconditional. > > > > Yes, sorry for sloppy wording. I'm testing a patch. > > Here's the patch I've tested (but not bootstrapped). As the incoming mode > is -1, 0 or +1 we can make things considerably simpler.
Great, thanks.
Marek
