On 10/10/16 13:35, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Hi Christophe,
On 13 July 2016 at 17:34, Thomas Preudhomme
<thomas.preudho...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2016 17:14:52 Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Hi Christophe,
I'm seeing:
gcc.target/arm/pr42574.c: syntax error in target selector
"arm_thumb1_ok && { ! arm_thumb1_movt_ok }" for " dg-do 1 compile {
arm_thumb1_ok && { ! arm_thumb1_movt_ok } } "
Oops. I remember the trial and error to find the right amount of curly braces
yet I can indeed reproduce the error now. The target keyword is missing. I'll
submit a patch asap.
Best regards,
Thomas
I've noticed that the new test
gcc.target/arm/movdi_movw.c scan-assembler-times movw\tr0, #61680 1
fails on armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf
--with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon-fp16
It seems DImode values are stored differently in register depending on the
endianness. For little endian the low bits would be in the lowest register, but
it's reverse in big endian. I'll adapt the test accordingly.
the other new tests pass, and using --with=mode=arm makes all three
of them unsupported.
Right, there is no reason to forbid ARM state indeed. I'll fix that too.
Sorry I missed it when I reported the other error.
No worry.
Can you have a look?
Absolutely.
Cheers,
Thomas
