On 26/09/16 22:36 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Fixed with attached patch.
François
On 26/09/2016 13:56, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: 23_containers/list/debug/invalidation/4.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160926/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_sequence.tcc:89:
error: 'void __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator_base::_M_detach_single()' is
protected within this context
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160926/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_sequence.tcc:112:
error: 'void __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator_base::_M_detach_single()' is
protected within this context
Andreas.
Index: include/debug/safe_base.h
===================================================================
--- include/debug/safe_base.h (revision 240509)
+++ include/debug/safe_base.h (working copy)
@@ -121,11 +121,11 @@
void
_M_detach();
+ public:
/** Likewise, but not thread-safe. */
void
_M_detach_single() throw ();
- public:
/** Determines if we are attached to the given sequence. */
bool
_M_attached_to(const _Safe_sequence_base* __seq) const
Would this be a smaller change, that doesn't make the member
accessible to all code?
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_base.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_base.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ namespace __gnu_debug
class _Safe_iterator_base
{
friend class _Safe_sequence_base;
+ template<typename> friend class _Safe_sequence;
public:
/** The sequence this iterator references; may be NULL to indicate
