On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > It seems unfortunate that the warning doesn't accept /* ... fall
> > through ... */ as a fallthrough comment.
>
> Seconded. The warning should take into account existing practices instead of
> forcing the user to make completely bogus changes to the code (and Ada should
> have been tested before the patch was approved).
The intent has been that we catch the most common forms, but still require it
not
to be complete free form. Because, as experience shows, people are
extremely creative in these comments, and it is not very good idea to
support everything. For ... fall through ... , what is the purpose of those
...s?
Jakub
