Hi,
On 26 September 2016 at 14:54, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 24/09/16 21:13 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> >> So, this has been applied to trunk, and also applies cleanly to the >> gcc-6 branch, and we need >> to backport it to fix PR libstdc++/77537. Ok for the gcc-6 branch? > > > Yes, OK for gcc-6-branch too, as it fixes a regression since 5.x > > I'm seeing regressions on the gcc-6-branch since this was committed, on arm and aarch64 targets. - PASS now FAIL [PASS => FAIL]: 20_util/declval/requirements/1_neg.cc (test for errors, line 2263) 20_util/declval/requirements/1_neg.cc (test for excess errors) 20_util/make_signed/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for errors, line 1928) 20_util/make_signed/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for excess errors) 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for errors, line 1781) 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for errors, line 1824) 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for excess errors) Error messages include: /aci-gcc-fsf/builds/gcc-fsf-gccsrc/obj-aarch64-none-linux-gnu/gcc3/aarch64-none-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:2270: error: static assertion failed: declval() must not be used! Is it just because the pattern in dg-error is *-*-* ? Christophe
