On September 23, 2016 6:17:17 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >On Sep 23, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Matthew Fortune ><matthew.fort...@imgtec.com> wrote: >> >> Doug Gilmore <doug.gilm...@imgtec.com> writes: >>>> From: Richard Biener [rguent...@suse.de] >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:43 AM >>>> To: Doug Gilmore >>>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org >>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-optimization/77654 >>>> >>>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Doug Gilmore wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>> Sorry I that missed point. I glossed your comment "addr_base >should >>>>> always be a pointer", causing me to go off into the weeds. >>>>> >>>>> New patch attached. >>>> >>>> Ok if successfully bootstrapped / tested. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Richard. >>> The change bootstrapped on X86_64 and the several "make check" >errors >>> also appeared in latest archived mail message to gcc-testresults. >> >> Committed as r240439. >> >> (Fixed whitespace/tab issue in the code and incorrect file in >changelog) >> >> I can't progress the bug status. Who does that normally? > >Hum.. not sure why, I thought commit people could do bug database >bits. Maybe someone will chime in on this topic for you.
You need to use a bugzilla account with your @gcc.gnu.org address. Those have appropriate permissions. Richard. >Anyway, anyone can move the bug along, just let us know what state >change you want. I've assumed Fixed. was the state change you were >interested in. I've done that.
