On 22 September 2016 at 13:03, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 22/09/16 01:49 -0700, Tim Shen wrote: >> >> Done. When writing the initial version, I was trying to save as much >> qualifications as possible (as long as the semantic doesn't change) >> for readability, but that might not be a good idea. > > > It does change the semantics, as forward<_Tp>(__tp) can find another > function via ADL (see the new test in this patch).
Yeah, it's not a question about readability or style, unqualified function calls attract the ADL demons like fairies attract vampires.
