On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:13:41AM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 09/21/2016 01:09 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote: > > > > I thought I remember discussing this macro with you, but see what was > > checked in I'll believe I'm thinking of something similar but different. > > I think this here was an earlier patch and the one we were discussing > recently was the other macro with a similar name. > > > Any way sorry about the dumb bug > > Stuff like this happens, no worries. But I've seen it happen a lot over the > years, and maybe you can see in this an explanation of why I'm often not the > most enthusiastic supporter of pure cleanup patches (those not motivated by > more substantial patches depending on them).
yeah, there's always some risk, though I also believe if you define something as cleaning up then it has some value compared to pointless permutation. Ironically I think one of the big motivating reasons to remove ifdefs is to remove a source of bustage. Trev > > > Bernd