Note that with all this mess I'll re-iterate some of my initial thoughts.
1) why not do this C++ (or C) specific stuff in the frontends, maybe
at gimplifying/genericization time?  That way you wouldn't need to
worry about middle-end features but you could rely solely on what
C/C++ permit.  It is, after all, C++ _frontend_ semantics that we
enforce here, in the middle-end, which looks out-of-place.

The front-end, really? After all this going back and forth? After you were all so worried about Ada, and now you're ditching it in favor of handling only C++?

Is the C++ memory model stuff going to be "ready" for 4.7?

No, not if you expect me rewrite things every day.

Reply via email to