On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:54:35AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > Martin's point, which I agree with, is that for C++ we want to use > "bool" rather than either of those.
Sure, I'm testing another version of this patch which has this fixed. Marek
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:54:35AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > Martin's point, which I agree with, is that for C++ we want to use > "bool" rather than either of those.
Sure, I'm testing another version of this patch which has this fixed. Marek