On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:26:04PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> On 09/13/2016 12:22 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> >This patch adds a TARGET_LRA_P (defined to hook_bool_void_false) to >> >every target that didn't yet override the hook. No functional change. >> >> This patch series makes very little sense to me. Adding 35 new instances >> of a hook definition so you can delete four others? > > No, the purpose is to default to LRA instead of reload. Everything should > switch to LRA eventually, so over time we need to define the macro in fewer > and fewer targets, until one day whatever remains can all be ripped out. > > Yes, many targets need the hook definition after this series; that should > stick out like a sore thumb, help to remind people to change their target > to use LRA (not a huge amount of work for most, although it can get tricky). > > And all new ports should use LRA, so it should be the default.
Since nobody else has said anything on this patch besides Bernd, I am going to say yes please. This patch in my mind is the right way forward. In the same new ports should not be cc0 ports (though I know some folks try that every once in a while). Thanks, Andrew > > Wrt "delete only four"... There are five or six or so more that use LRA, > but those can all be switched to use old reload instead. Some day that > will be turned off, too. > > > Segher
