On 01/09/16 10:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 01/09/16 08:47, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> Since you're going to need a back-port there should be a PR filed for this. >> >> PR target/77439 >> >>> Have you checked that this works with multi-lib dejagnu runs and on >>> hard-float systems? I doubt this will work in armhf-linux, for example. >> >> No, I guess some dg-skip-if would be in order, but I'm not able to devise >> one. >> > > Since the test is an execution test, why not just drop the problematic > parts of dg-options "-mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp" and rely on multilib > permutations as appropriate. That gives more all-round coverage as well. > > R. >
That would also allow you to drop the effective-target test as well. R.
