On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:51:38PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Well, the patch could use __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ just as well as __i386__
> > (the effect would be an extra union member
>
> s/union/struct/. Though I've always wondered why it is a struct and not a
> union. Maybe change it to union while we're doing an ABI change anyway?
Yeah, me too. The initial implementation is here
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg00841.html> but I don't see any
comments wrt max_align_t being a struct or a union there.
Marek
