Hello Jakub, > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:32:51PM +0800, Terry Guo wrote: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_x_tst.o compile > > FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_y_tst.o compile > > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_x_tst.o- > c_compat_y_tst.o > > link > > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_x_tst.o- > c_compat_y_tst.o > > execute > > > > On my machine, the error message is "error: width of 'a' exceeds its > type". > > My GCC is cross built for arm-none-eabi based on upstream GCC 4.6. > The > > command I run this case is simply as: "make check-gcc > > RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=arm-none-eabi-qemu/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex- > m3 > > compat.exp=struct-layout-1*". Are there anything else I should do to > pass > > this case? > > Look into gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log, search for struct-layout- > 1_generate.exe > and see whether -e has been passed to it? If not, debug the tcl bits > which > are supposed to pass it, but for some reason don't, if yes, look into > the > generator under debugger why it generates the large enum bitfield > bitsizes > anyway (you can cut'n'paste the *generate.exe command line, compile it > with > -g and rerun it under debugger...). >
What you said is for compat/struct-layout-1.exp. What I said is for compat/compat.exp. The case contains three files struct-layout-1_x.c, struct-layout-1_y.c and struct-layout-1_main.c. All of them are independent files and not generated by generate.exe. Meanwhile do you think it is necessary to keep this cases in compat.exp given we already have struct-layout-1.exp? BR, Terry
